| General Information |
| Professor: |
Cassandra Pinnick |
| Course: |
PHIL 115 |
| Course Title: |
Intro To Elem. Logic |
| Student Grade: |
A |
| Post Date: |
4:41:40 PM 5/22/2009 |
| Overall Rating: |
Good  |
|
|
|
|
| Exam Information |
| Exam Content: |
 Multiple Choice
Matching
 True/False
Fill in the Blank
Essay
Problem Solving
|
| Mandatory Final: |
Yes |
| Cumulative Final: |
Yes |
|
|
|
| Other Information |
| Textbook Required: |
Yes |
| Extra Credit Available: |
Not Specified |
| Attendance Required: |
Yes |
| Quantity of Notes: |
Moderate |
| Difficulty: |
Moderate |
|
|
|
| Additional Comments |
|
This class isn't a joke. Don't expect to waltz in and earn an "A" because of superior intellect (My GPA is above 3.5 and I struggled to earn my "A"). This class, as well as Dr. Pinnick, makes you LEARN the subject matter. There's a lecture - you must take excellent notes because you have to recite and write it verbatim on the tests and quizzes (hint: flashcards are your friends). I can't say that the class was always enjoyable but I know I am better off having taken this course. She is definitely a strict teacher but she means well. She isn't satisfied that you "memorized" something - you have to "know it", as well as know how to use it. The class is very straightforward. Since much of the material builds off previous lessons learned you must stay caught up. If you miss a day of class you might fall far behind. She really does base much of your final grade on your progression throughout the year. This is the hardest class I have yet taken in college. You really do deserve whatever grade you get in this course.
|
|
|
|
| Abuse/Correction Report |
 |
If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button. |
|
|
|
