| General Information |
| Professor: |
James Baker |
| Course: |
HIST 240 |
| Course Title: |
United States History Before 1865 |
| Student Grade: |
Not Specified |
| Post Date: |
12:27:47 AM 11/7/2006 |
| Overall Rating: |
Poor  |
|
|
|
|
| Exam Information |
| Exam Content: |
 Multiple Choice
Matching
True/False
Fill in the Blank
 Essay
Problem Solving
|
| Mandatory Final: |
Not Specified |
| Cumulative Final: |
Not Specified |
|
|
|
| Other Information |
| Textbook Required: |
Yes |
| Extra Credit Available: |
No |
| Attendance Required: |
No |
| Quantity of Notes: |
Overkill |
| Difficulty: |
Difficult |
|
|
|
| Additional Comments |
|
Dr. Baker certainly knows and understand US History, but as a professor he is horrible. He doesnt seem to relate to the students, is very smug, and always thinks he is right. His tests are near impossible, and he doesnt clearly define what he wants us to put on the test. We take down a huge amount of notes, but he doesnt want us to necessarily use the notes for our test which makes no sense. The readings he assing are short and easy, but there are so many pages and I have other classes I need to worry about so therefore I do not have time to go over the book. I dont understand why he thinks he is so much better. Of course, he will never admit it because no one admits their faults. Plus, he is just a boring person and so is his class. I'm a History major and if I hate the subject he is teaching then its quite obviously him. Every other history class I've had has been so much fun, but I hate going to his class. To sum it up, he is a terrible professor who is quite disconnected with the student body, and is too narcissistic to do anything to better himself.
|
|
|
|
| Abuse/Correction Report |
 |
If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button. |
|
|
|
