General Information |
Professor: |
Cassandra Pinnick |
Course: |
PHIL |
Course Title: |
Philosophy (the Love Of Wisdom) |
Student Grade: |
Not Specified |
Post Date: |
9:52:35 PM 2/16/2006 |
Overall Rating: |
Good ![Good](/images/icons/iconSmiley0.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Exam Information |
Exam Content: |
Multiple Choice
Matching
True/False
Fill in the Blank
Essay
Problem Solving
|
Mandatory Final: |
Not Specified |
Cumulative Final: |
Not Specified |
|
|
|
Other Information |
Textbook Required: |
Not Specified |
Extra Credit Available: |
Not Specified |
Attendance Required: |
Not Specified |
Quantity of Notes: |
Not Specified |
Difficulty: |
Not Specified |
|
|
|
Additional Comments |
Oh, how my heart aches to hear these rebukes of my dear Dr. Pinnick. This is especially so when they come from student commentaries like this: "she would say that the sentence structure was so bad that she could no [sic] grade the philosophical content." "No grade the philosophical content"? Oh, to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune: to have to teach philosophy--philosophy!--to the students of WKU when one could be reading Plato, Kant, Hobbes, and of course, Rasputin.
To have to teach students who write things like "no grade the philosophical content," when one could be writing obscure articles in obscure journals.... It's not fair.
|
|
|
|
Abuse/Correction Report |
![!](/images/icons/iconExclaim.gif) |
If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button. |
|
|
|