| General Information |
| Professor: |
C Pinnick |
| Course: |
PHIL 120 |
| Course Title: |
Into To Phil |
| Student Grade: |
C |
| Post Date: |
9:20:55 AM 1/19/2006 |
| Overall Rating: |
Poor  |
|
|
|
|
| Exam Information |
| Exam Content: |
 Multiple Choice
Matching
True/False
Fill in the Blank
 Essay
Problem Solving
|
| Mandatory Final: |
Not Specified |
| Cumulative Final: |
Not Specified |
|
|
|
| Other Information |
| Textbook Required: |
Yes |
| Extra Credit Available: |
No |
| Attendance Required: |
No |
| Quantity of Notes: |
Moderate |
| Difficulty: |
Moderate |
|
|
|
| Additional Comments |
|
I really do not think this class is difficult, just the instructor. I agree with the other student that she does not deserve the title "Dr." and I too found several spelling and grammar mistakes in her communications. She grades so ridiculously, and if you do question her, you are wasting your time. If you happen to get an answer, it will something very different then notes she puts on your papers, and she does not explain herself. She will just tell you to read and re-read the “Rulebook,†blah blah blah, just tell me what I did wrong. I have never seen anything like her. I would have my papers proofed at the writing center and get an all clear, but when she would grade them, she would say that the sentence structure was so bad that she could no grade the philosophical content. What BS. She and her class SUCK!!! One tip if you are brave enough to take her class be sure that all your emails are grammar and spell checked, or she will hold it over your head the whole semester.
|
|
|
|
| Abuse/Correction Report |
 |
If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button. |
|
|
|
