| General Information |
| Professor: |
Steven Wininger |
| Course: |
PSY 310 |
| Course Title: |
Educational Psychology |
| Student Grade: |
B |
| Post Date: |
2:27:04 PM 1/23/2004 |
| Overall Rating: |
OK  |
|
|
|
|
| Exam Information |
| Exam Content: |
 Multiple Choice
Matching
True/False
 Fill in the Blank
Essay
Problem Solving
|
| Mandatory Final: |
Yes |
| Cumulative Final: |
Yes |
|
|
|
| Other Information |
| Textbook Required: |
Yes |
| Extra Credit Available: |
Yes |
| Attendance Required: |
No |
| Quantity of Notes: |
Moderate |
| Difficulty: |
Moderate |
|
|
|
| Additional Comments |
Dr. Wininger gives good notes, and his tests come straight from them. He gives 3 quizzes, all open-book, but you must read the selections. Other than the quiz readings, I never opened the book again. However, I did have a few problems with his grading! First of all, he lets his grad student grade the critical performances, and will not change the grade that you get from her under any circumstances. He keeps a place on the syllabus for keeping up with your own grades. I had kept up with my grades all semester and needed a 90% on the final to make an A for the course. I never missed one day, and was only late one morning, and I made an 89% on the final. He doesnt take participation and attendance into his grade at all, giving me a B for the course. I think all teachers should take it into consideration!!!
Added 06/23/2004
"I have serious doubts that this student needed a 90 on her final to get an A, got an 89 and a B for the course. I am the professor and do round the grades. In this case the grade would have been rounded. I believe the student did not calculate the grades correctly. In addition, I have changed critical performance grades in the past for students who provide a valid rationale for a change of grade."
|
|
|
|
| Abuse/Correction Report |
 |
If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button. |
|
|
|
