| General Information |
| Professor: |
Cassandra Pinnick |
| Course: |
PHIL 115 |
| Course Title: |
Intro To Logic/intro To Phil. |
| Student Grade: |
A |
| Post Date: |
8:14:13 PM 8/14/2004 |
| Overall Rating: |
Good  |
|
|
|
|
| Exam Information |
| Exam Content: |
 Multiple Choice
 Matching
True/False
Fill in the Blank
Essay
Problem Solving
|
| Mandatory Final: |
Yes |
| Cumulative Final: |
Not Specified |
|
|
|
| Other Information |
| Textbook Required: |
Yes |
| Extra Credit Available: |
Yes |
| Attendance Required: |
Yes |
| Quantity of Notes: |
Moderate |
| Difficulty: |
Difficult |
|
|
|
| Additional Comments |
|
All of the scathing inditments of Dr. Pinnick are warranted. She's not an easy professor to have. But the ad-hom's launched against her in so many of these posts are repugnant. Although she can be hard, she does it for a reason. I can garauntee that if you work hard in her classes you will get an A, and unlike so many other mental midgets who "teach" on this hill, you will actually learn something. I enjoyed Logic and Philosophy, and I'm taking her advanced logic course simply because I want to learn more about logic. I know that when i sign up for Dr. Pinnick I'll learn something, not just get a grade for filling a seat.
|
|
|
|
| Abuse/Correction Report |
 |
If you suspect this evaluation is inaccurate or an abuse of the system, please let us know. For more information, click the help button. |
|
|
|
